Summary by CodyWild 4 years ago
I feel like you really understood the paper! We actually worked on graph convolutions for a while before we looked closely at existing chemical fingerprints and noticed the similarities. We then rewrote everything to make the similarities clear. This paper was almost rejected from NIPS, I think because when viewed this way it looks very incremental. One minor correction - the paper was from 2015, not 2018.

Thanks so much for the comment! It's always great to get confirmation that I've understood things correctly. Apologies for the date confusion; I totally had 2015 in my head, and must have just written down the wrong date.

Your comment:

ShortScience.org allows researchers to publish paper summaries that are voted on and ranked!

Sponsored by: