[link]
Summary by Alexander Jung 8 years ago
* DCGANs are just a different architecture of GANs.
* In GANs a Generator network (G) generates images. A discriminator network (D) learns to differentiate between real images from the training set and images generated by G.
* DCGANs basically convert the laplacian pyramid technique (many pairs of G and D to progressively upscale an image) to a single pair of G and D.
### How
* Their D: Convolutional networks. No linear layers. No pooling, instead strided layers. LeakyReLUs.
* Their G: Starts with 100d noise vector. Generates with linear layers 1024x4x4 values. Then uses fractionally strided convolutions (move by 0.5 per step) to upscale to 512x8x8. This is continued till Cx32x32 or Cx64x64. The last layer is a convolution to 3x32x32/3x64x64 (Tanh activation).
* The fractionally strided convolutions do basically the same as the progressive upscaling in the laplacian pyramid. So it's basically one laplacian pyramid in a single network and all upscalers are trained jointly leading to higher quality images.
* They use Adam as their optimizer. To decrease instability issues they decreased the learning rate to 0.0002 (from 0.001) and the momentum/beta1 to 0.5 (from 0.9).
*Architecture of G using fractionally strided convolutions to progressively upscale the image.*
### Results
* High quality images. Still with distortions and errors, but at first glance they look realistic.
* Smooth interpolations between generated images are possible (by interpolating between the noise vectors and feeding these interpolations into G).
* The features extracted by D seem to have some potential for unsupervised learning.
* There seems to be some potential for vector arithmetics (using the initial noise vectors) similar to the vector arithmetics with wordvectors. E.g. to generate mean with sunglasses via `vector(men) + vector(sunglasses)`.
*Generated images, bedrooms.*
*Generated images, faces.*
### Rough chapter-wise notes
* Introduction
* For unsupervised learning, they propose to use to train a GAN and then reuse the weights of D.
* GANs have traditionally been hard to train.
* Approach and model architecture
* They use for D an convnet without linear layers, withput pooling layers (only strides), LeakyReLUs and Batch Normalization.
* They use for G ReLUs (hidden layers) and Tanh (output).
* Details of adversarial training
* They trained on LSUN, Imagenet-1k and a custom dataset of faces.
* Minibatch size was 128.
* LeakyReLU alpha 0.2.
* They used Adam with a learning rate of 0.0002 and momentum of 0.5.
* They note that a higher momentum lead to oscillations.
* LSUN
* 3M images of bedrooms.
* They use an autoencoder based technique to filter out 0.25M near duplicate images.
* Faces
* They downloaded 3M images of 10k people.
* They extracted 350k faces with OpenCV.
* Empirical validation of DCGANs capabilities
* Classifying CIFAR-10 GANs as a feature extractor
* They train a pair of G and D on Imagenet-1k.
* D's top layer has `512*4*4` features.
* They train an SVM on these features to classify the images of CIFAR-10.
* They achieve a score of 82.8%, better than unsupervised K-Means based methods, but worse than Exemplar CNNs.
* Classifying SVHN digits using GANs as a feature extractor
* They reuse the same pipeline (D trained on CIFAR-10, SVM) for the StreetView House Numbers dataset.
* They use 1000 SVHN images (with the features from D) to train the SVM.
* They achieve 22.48% test error.
* Investigating and visualizing the internals of the networks
* Walking in the latent space
* The performs walks in the latent space (= interpolate between input noise vectors and generate several images for the interpolation).
* They argue that this might be a good way to detect overfitting/memorizations as those might lead to very sudden (not smooth) transitions.
* Visualizing the discriminator features
* They use guided backpropagation to visualize what the feature maps in D have learned (i.e. to which images they react).
* They can show that their LSUN-bedroom GAN seems to have learned in an unsupervised way what beds and windows look like.
* Forgetting to draw certain objects
* They manually annotated the locations of objects in some generated bedroom images.
* Based on these annotations they estimated which feature maps were mostly responsible for generating the objects.
* They deactivated these feature maps and regenerated the images.
* That decreased the appearance of these objects. It's however not as easy as one feature map deactivation leading to one object disappearing. They deactivated quite a lot of feature maps (200) and they objects were often still quite visible or replaced by artefacts/errors.
* Vector arithmetic on face samples
* Wordvectors can be used to perform semantic arithmetic (e.g. `king - man + woman = queen`).
* The unsupervised representations seem to be useable in a similar fashion.
* E.g. they generated images via G. They then picked several images that showed men with glasses and averaged these image's noise vectors. They did with same with men without glasses and women without glasses. Then they performed on these vectors `men with glasses - mean without glasses + women without glasses` to get `woman with glasses
